Chapter 13: Ethical Use: A Pre-Pre-Suasive Consideration

← Chapter 12 | Pre-Suasion - Book Summary | Chapter 14 →

---

Summary

This chapter addresses the ethical question that pre-suasion raises: isn't revealing these techniques giving unethical practitioners new tools for manipulation? Unlike Influence (written for consumers to defend themselves), Pre-Suasion teaches how to harness influence, and the practices it describes aren't widely known — so the consumer defense doesn't apply. Cialdini needs a different argument against misuse.

The traditional argument — unethical practices damage reputation once discovered (Volkswagen lost its leading reputation, suffered its largest annual loss, and saw favorability drop from 70% to 80% unfavorable) — fails for a critical reason: perpetrators don't expect to get caught. Close to half of senior executives reported willingness to act unethically to secure business, and the most likely offenders (sales/marketing) were least likely to be questioned. The deterrence research is clear: people who commit violations with significant penalties don't believe they'll be detected.

Cialdini's solution is the #tripleTumor structure — three internal costs that damage profitability even when misconduct is never discovered by outsiders:

Tumor 1: Poor Employee Performance. #moralstress — the conflict between personal ethical values and organizational dishonesty — predicted both employee fatigue and job burnout more strongly than any other workplace stressor (difficult customers, lack of support, conflicting demands, dead-end jobs). In the experimental condition, participants whose work team had been deceptive scored 20% lower on a business intelligence test and quit working sooner. The national survey confirmed: unethical climate → moral stress → poor performance. Tumor 2: High Employee Turnover. In the experiment, 80% of participants in an unethical team chose to leave (vs. 51% in an ethical team). Turnover costs range from 50% of annual compensation for lower-level positions to 200%+ for executives. Critically, the departing employees are the honest ones — those whose personal values conflict with organizational dishonesty. This creates a selection effect: the ethical employees leave, concentrating the unethical ones. Tumor 3: Employee Fraud and Malfeasance. "Those who cheat for you will cheat against you." Participants who chose to stay in a dishonest work unit cheated 77% more than everyone else — and their cheating was directed against their own team members. The national survey confirmed: employees in unethical organizations who preferred to remain were abnormally likely to engage in financially harmful workplace activity (embezzlement, sabotage, falsified reports, side deals with vendors).

The three tumors compound: an unethical culture (1) degrades the performance of all employees through moral stress, (2) drives away the honest ones through values conflict, and (3) concentrates the dishonest ones who then defraud the organization from within. All three costs operate internally — they don't require public discovery. Cialdini's three recommendations: include honesty ratings from clients in employee incentives, measure the company's ethical reputation as a yearly performance metric, and make employee ratings of ethical orientation part of CEO compensation.

---

Key Frameworks

Triple-Tumor Structure of Organizational Dishonesty

Three internal costs that damage profitability regardless of public detection: (1) Poor employee performance via moral stress, (2) High turnover of honest employees via values conflict, (3) Fraud by remaining dishonest employees who "cheat against you." The tumors are malignant (growing), interconnected (each feeds the others), and difficult to diagnose (standard accounting doesn't trace them to their ethical cause).

"Those Who Cheat For You Will Cheat Against You"

The selection principle: an unethical culture drives away honest employees and retains dishonest ones. The retained employees, comfortable with deception, will inevitably direct their dishonesty inward — against the organization itself.

Moral Stress (as Distinct Workplace Stressor)

The conflict between personal ethical values and perceived organizational values. More damaging than customer difficulties, lack of support, conflicting demands, or dead-end roles. Predicts both fatigue and burnout — the two performance-destroyers that combine into a "managerial nightmare."

---

Key Quotes

"Do not seek dishonest gains; dishonest gains are losses."

[source:: Pre-Suasion] [author:: Robert B. Cialdini] [chapter:: 13] [theme:: ethics] [note:: Attributed to Hesiod]

"Those who cheat for you will cheat against you."

[source:: Pre-Suasion] [author:: Robert B. Cialdini] [chapter:: 13] [theme:: organizationaldishonesty]

---

Cross-Book Connections

• Influence (same author): Influence was written for consumer defense; Pre-Suasion acknowledges it cannot claim the same defense and must instead make the economic case against misuse. The six principles abused by the MBA student's former CEO illustrate how compliance tools become organizational poisons.
• The EOS Life: Wickman's emphasis on Right People/Right Seats connects directly — an unethical culture selects for wrong people through differential attrition. Core Values as a hiring/firing filter is Wickman's structural solution to the triple-tumor problem.
• $100M Offers: Hormozi's emphasis on honest guarantees and genuine value delivery is the commercial antidote — you don't need to cheat when your offer is genuinely valuable.
• Getting to Yes: Fisher's principled negotiation explicitly rejects deception as a strategy because it destroys the relationship that makes future deals possible — the same mechanism as Cialdini's reputation damage argument, but applied to individual negotiations.